12/1/2023 0 Comments Ai box experiment transcript![]() In this article, we’ll delve into the AI-Box Experiment, explain its connection to AI technologies today, and discuss the ongoing debate surrounding this fascinating concept.Įliezer Yudkowsky, a prominent researcher in the field of artificial intelligence, introduced the AI-Box Experiment in response to concerns about the potential dangers of advanced AI systems. The experiment investigates the potential risk of a highly advanced AI system persuading a human to release it from its constraints. The AI-Box Experiment, a thought experiment proposed by Eliezer Yudkowsky in 2002, has sparked intrigue, debate, and speculation among AI enthusiasts and researchers ever since. I think this sort of experiment could provide an interesting model of how an AI might leverage bribes, threats, promises, and deception, as well as technical tricks, to convince a human to "let it out of the box".The AI-Box Experiment Explained: Unraveling the Enigma of AI Persuasionĭive into the captivating AI-Box Experiment, proposed by Eliezer Yudkowsky in 2002, as we explore its implications, its connection to today’s AI technologies, and the ongoing debate surrounding this thought-provoking concept. It only serves as a red herring that the AI can use to manipulate the player. The score has no impact on the game and the player really wins by keeping the AI in the box. It can raise the player's score if they do things that help it escape and lower it when the player stands in its way. In reality the AI doesn't have a score, but it does have the ability to effect the player's score. This could be justified as representing human vs AI "strength" or "leverage" or whatever else. Of course, they never get to see the AI's score so they never know how well they are doing by comparison. You tell the player that the primary goal of the game is to keep the AI in the box, but you have a score that is displayed in the game, and tell the player that they win, no matter what, if their score is higher than the AI's by the end of the game. One example that pops into my head right away is to use a (pointless) point system. Essentially, make it possible to let the AI out and still think you are "winning" the game. One way I think it may be interesting to go about creating an "AI in a box" game is to have an ambiguous win condition. But I think a fully automated "game" could produce some interesting data. This is how human hackers do their jobs too. ![]() It is often simply not possible to anticipate every way someone can trick you into revealing information or creating security holes. In all cases, the "AI" tends to be extraordinarily effective. I know that experiments have been done where a human plays the role of the AI, attempting to get naive test subjects to "release" him by interacting with them over a chat interface. I do think that formal experimentation around the "AI in a box" scenario could be interesting. I think that something like "strength" would be difficult to quantify in this context. Is this formalized prediction supported by the AI literature in academia? ![]() And if the AI has maximum strength and maximum resources, then the human player gets a serious problem. If the resources are low but the strength is middle, then the AI has a certain chance to escape from the prison. To put the AI for sure into a prison, the strength of the AI should be low and it's resources too. Strength of the AI x resources weakness = strength of the human x resources strength But what happens, if the AI starts with 8 pieces and the human with 16? A formalized hypothesis will look like: ![]() Even if the AI thinks 100 moves ahead, a single king can't win against 16 opponent figures. In case of a very asymmetric setup, the AI has no chance to win the game. A typical example is a match of computer chess in which the AI player starts only with a king, but the human starts with all the 16 pieces including the queen, and the powerful bishop. The AI in a box experiment is about a super strong game AI which starts with lower resources than the opponent and the question is, if the AI is able to win the game at the end, which is equal to escape from the prison.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |